Research Track: Living Labs for Business and emerging Technologies

TIME

11:00 – 12:45

Chaired by

Dimitri Schuurman

Type of Session

Research Session

DESCRIPTION

Following the evaluation procedure the OLLD evaluation committee has accepted the research papers. All papers reflect on the theme of the conference LIVING LABS FRONTIERS: Driving systemic change through Soci(et)al Engagement, for real impact” explores how Living Labs can drive meaningful societal systemic change through active engagement and collaboration.” and have been classified according to its sub-tracks. These are: TRACK 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges; TRACK 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, collaboration and innovation ecosystems; TRACK 3: LLs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement; TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology; TRACK 5: Living Labs Operation, Methods, Tools, and Impact.

"Living Labs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement" papers by the Evaluation Committee

What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Exploring Challenges of Living Lab Methodology in Publishing Applications

Elias Blanckaert, Louise Hallström, Iris Jennes and Wendy Van den Broeck

Elias Blanckaert

User Researcher

AbstractThis paper addresses the main research question: what are the challenges for implementing a living lab approach in innovation projects? To answer this question we first conducted a literature review on the definition, advantages and pitfalls of living labs. Then, we discuss the living lab approach as set-up in the anonymized project. During the implementation of the living lab approach within this project three main challenges surfaced: (1) knowledge on market and stakeholder needs in the proposal phase, (2) use of terminology in recruitment efforts, (3) implementation of stakeholder insights in technological development cycles via user requirements.

Key words: Innovation projects, Living Lab methodology, Stakeholder involvement, Challenges

Music360: Assessing the true Value of Music

Denis Guilhot, Gonçal Calvo, Jaap Gordijn, Anna Bon, Roel Wieringa, Sander Teekens, Frank Lucassen, Giovanni Giachetti, Daniel Catalá, Blanca de Miguel, Conrado Carrascosa, María de Miguel, Oscar Pastor, Bruno Gaminha, Lauri Ogawa, Piia Moore, Lisa NiChoisdealbha, Ioan Kaes

Denis Guilhot, PhD

Senior Innovation Engineer in the Innovation department of BMAT

Abstract:

The online music economy has become the largest source of revenue for the music industry, but for many less-famous artists, live and background music remains the main source of income. Royalties generated by music usage in these environments are often not distributed based on actual music usage, creating an unfair distribution system. 

The MUSIC360 project aims at generating information about the usage of background music and providing a model to conceptualise and measure the economical and societal value of music. The platform developed will collect data at a fine-grained level through five national Living Labs and a European one.

This paper introduces the project goals, objectives, and strategy (with a special emphasis on the Living Labs) to propose a new method for the sustainable development of Culture and Creativity, specifically the music sector, at a national and European level. It presents the way in which these Living Labs will be used to contribute to the transition towards a fair and transparent royalties distribution solution that promotes social justice and a more diverse and resilient music ecosystem and enables fairer policymaking and more accurate royalty distribution through information about the real usage of background music. 

Key words: Background music; value; music metadata; neighbouring rights; author rights; royalties

The Dynamics of Innovation Networks in Living Labs: A System-Theoretical Approach

Matthias Vogel, Prof. Dr. Giuseppe Strina

Matthias Vogel

PhD Candidate, University of Siegen

AbstractThis research investigates the dynamics of interactions within innovation networks, using the practical example of a Lab. The focus is on analyzing how various actors within the network interact and the impacts of these interactions on the innovation process. Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory serves as the theoretical foundation, enabling an understanding of the complexity and emergent phenomena within these networks. The study employs qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with key actors in two Lab projects. Preliminary results suggest that transdisciplinary collaboration and open network structures are crucial for successful innovation. Detailed examination of interaction patterns and emergent phenomena within these labs highlights the importance of flexible structures and open communication channels. This study aims to contribute to a broader understanding of collaborative environments in innovation networks and provide practical recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of Lab-formats.

Key words: System Theory, Innovation Networks, Collaboration, Emergent Phenomena 

Designing Smart Communication Platform with Living Labs: Crafting Innovative Urban Environments

Hee Dae Kim, Hee Sook Yoo, Su Jung Lee

Hee-Sook Yoo, PhD

Director of Regional Digital Industry Team at National IT Industry Promotion Agency, South Korea and Advisory member of the Police Lab at Korean National Police Agency

Hee-Dae Kim,PhD

Director General at Daegu Technopark, South Korea

AbstractLiving Labs prioritize demand-driven innovation and have developed into an effective methodology addressing challenges in urban development, society, technology, and the economy. However, Living Labs still face challenges like stakeholder rewards, business connection difficulties, excessive flexibility, repeated issues, and redundant resource investments. This paper presents a Smart Communication Platform (SCP) as city innovation methodology to address inherent limitations of Living Labs, analyzing its five-year application in Daegu, South Korea, and providing implications. SCP Developed through Korea’s Smart City Innovation Growth Engine and Solution in Our Society Lab projects, SCP facilitates citizen scientists and private companies in problem-solving while scaling up proven solutions.

We validated our research questions through significant results at each stage of SCP. For a sustainable innovative urban environment, citizen scientists and urban problem banks are essential preparatory steps. The SCP model helps secure new market opportunities (sustainability), minimize redundant resource and budget investments (reproducibility), and accelerate decision-making (innovativeness)

Key words: Participation Modeling, Smart Communication Platform, Citizen Science, Permissioning City, Solution in Our Society (SOS) Lab

RECHARGING Business Models of Cultural Heritage Institutions in Living Labs

Ilaria Rosetti, Trilce Navarrete, Ellen Loots, Úna Hussey, Ragnar Siil

Úna Hussey

Project Manager at the Hunt Museum in Limerick

AbstractThe Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance and power of cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) in connecting people in times of global crisis through new avenues of engagement. CHIs can create social, cultural, and economic value by enabling participation and co-creation, but a major challenge is capitalizing on this value by integrating participatory practices across organizations’ value chains.

This research explores the potential for museums to adopt a Living Lab approach in co-creating innovative business models with their value network to improve CHIs’ (financial) resilience and bring mutual benefits to all engaged stakeholders. To that end, a combination of a systematic literature review with primary and secondary data analysis is used to develop and test a model of Living Labs as catalysts of (cultural) Participatory Business Models (PBMs) within the RECHARGE project.

The results of this research provide a definition and a framework of participatory business model(-making), propose a theoretical model of Living Labs as catalysts of PBMs for CHIs, and reveal bottlenecks and improvement opportunities of the model tested against the workflow of museums experimenting with their business models in Living Labs. This framework informs the activation of multiple living labs in CHIs that act as catalysts to develop, implement, and innovate participatory business models to foster resilience and innovation.

Key wordsLiving Labs, Participatory Business Models, Cultural Heritage Organisation, Museums