Research Track: Top Contributions

TIME

11:00 – 12:45

Chaired by

Dimitri Schuurman

Type of Session

Research Session

DESCRIPTION

Following the evaluation procedure the OLLD evaluation committee has accepted the research papers. All papers reflect on the theme of the conference LIVING LABS FRONTIERS: Driving systemic change through Soci(et)al Engagement, for real impact” explores how Living Labs can drive meaningful societal systemic change through active engagement and collaboration.” and have been classified according to its sub-tracks. These are: TRACK 1: Living Labs for Grand Societal Challenges; TRACK 2: Living Labs for Policies, Governance, collaboration and innovation ecosystems; TRACK 3: LLs for Inclusive Soci(et)al Engagement; TRACK 4: Living Labs for Business and Emerging Technology; TRACK 5: Living Labs Operation, Methods, Tools, and Impact.

Top contribution papers by the Evaluation Committee

Digital bother and burden in older age: a transnational LEGO® Serious Play® exploration

Leen Broeckx

Panel Manager LiCalab/Thomas More University of Applied Sciences

Abstract: Bother and burden are terms associated with older persons in the management of a range of health conditions. As healthcare becomes more digitalized, older persons are encouraged to use digital health and wellbeing technologies to manage their own self-care. To date, however, there has been little examination of how bother, as distinct from burden, with such technologies may impact engagement with digital self-management of personal health and wellbeing. Using the LEGO® Serious Play® method, the concepts of bother and burden are examined with older persons in Ireland and Belgium. Findings have implications for the successful implementation of digital health technology solutions intended for use by older citizens as well as the use of the LEGO® Serious Play® method in living lab contexts.

Key wordsDigital health; older persons; ageing; living lab: LEGO Serious Play

 

Platform-level Living Lab Canvas: a tool to support the sustainable management of living labs for social transformation

Fumiya Akasaka

Senior researcher, Human Augmentation Research Center (HARC), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan

AbstractThis study focuses on living labs as ‘platforms for co-creation (i.e. platform-level living labs)’, in which multiple co-creation projects on diverse social issues are promoted through mutual interaction among them. The long-term operation of such a platform-level living lab is important for achieving social innovation and transformation through the living lab approach; however, methods and tools to support its sustainable management and operation have not been developed. Therefore, this study attempts to develop a canvas tool to support the sustainable operation and management of a platform-level living lab. It does so based on the qualitative analysis of data collected from in-depth interviews conducted with experts who have organized actual cases of long-term practicing platform-level living labs in Japan. We also conduct the case-based application of the developed canvas tool and find that the tool is useful in that it enables us to consider various perspectives that are important when setting up and managing a platform-level living lab. This study also provides a ‘starting point’ for further discussions on a methodology for the integrated use of multi-level canvases in the sustainable management of platform-level living labs.

Key wordsDigital health; older persons; ageing; living lab: LEGO Serious Play

The Living Lab Modeler: A tool to leverage the activities and impact of your Living Lab

Eleni Toli

Research associate and Senior Project Manager Athena RC and at the Department of Informatics and Telecommunications at the University of Athens

Christos Marinos-Kouris

Research associate, Athena RC and at the Department of Informatics and Telecommunications at the University of Athens

AbstractThe Living Lab Modeler (LLM) is a web-based application that enables the digital representation of Living Labs (LLs) and the facilitation of their activities.

LLM is designed on the premise of LLs being user-centred innovation ecosystems that rely on multi-stakeholder collaboration to drive innovation. The LLM addresses commonly observed shortcomings in the operation of Living Labs, by providing a digital solution to support core LL activities such as stakeholder management, activity tracking, outcome documentation, and reporting, including also more specialised modules that depict the interactions among the LL’s ‘ecosystem’ entities. The first version of LLM was developed as part of the DESIRA H2020 project and tested with European LLs that sprang on the premise of DESIRA.

This paper presents the empirical observations along with Living Lab related theoretical and conceptual perspectives that contributed to the shaping of the LLM, subsequently developing on the main design principles and functionalities, providing a comprehensive outline of the multifaceted capabilities of the tool and showcasing its potential.

Key words: Living Lab operation, Living Lab management, digital tools and solutions, user-centred innovation ecosystems, co-creation methodologies

Local Government Living Labs: An Australian Explanatory Case Study

Sonja Pedell

Director of the Swinburne Living Lab

AbstractWe are promoting the broader adoption of the living lab concept by local government to build on established community linkages in co-creating stakeholder value. This paper presents an engagement model derived from the literature and records and reflects the experience of one Australian Local Government Authority (LGA) that has launched a series of living lab projects. The model considers four factors from a value co-creation perspective: the extent of engagement (the negotiated deal), the outcome(s) sought (the value proposition), partners and roles (creating and delivering stakeholder value) and the broader context (value-in-use realised). A LMS (MoodleCloud) was used as a data repository to both organise academic and field records collected and to share case learnings. The LGA community-engaged strategic planning process had identified a need to facilitate community action to achieve some of its goals, and embraced the living lab concept following a successful pilot project. It has engaged with a university in co-design workshops to identify enhanced community engagement pathways and supported seven short circular economy deployment projects to both demonstrate benefits and identify ways the LGA might scale up its activities.

Key words: Living Labs, Local Government, Strategic alignment, Societal engagement, Value co-creation.  

Urban Living Labs as user-centered ecosystem: Spatial Persona as a Tool for Public Space Revitalization, the Case of Lange Jan Park in Heerlen

Nurhan Abujidi

Professor at Zuyd University of Applied Sciences and Head of the Smart Urban Redesign research centre.

Poorya Eghtesadi

AbstractThis study explores how socio-spatial power dynamics influence the identity and perception of public spaces within an Urban Living Lab setting. The research investigates Lange Jan Park in Heerlen’s social dynamics, user perceptions, and existing power structures by combining methods like observations, qualitative research, co-creation, co-design activities, and mapping Lange Jan Park. The findings are used to create user and Spatial Persona, which are key in the design process. The study also involves a collaborative co-creation and co-design process to develop scenarios and interventions aimed at improving social interactions, addressing power imbalances, and changing negative perceptions. The Urban Living Lab model and its quintuple helix framework guide this process, encouraging active dialogue and meaningful outcomes.

Key words: Urban Living Lab, Quintuple Helix, Spatial Persona, Public Space Revitalization, Socio-Spatial Power Relations. 

Unpacking the conditions leading to social innovation: Living Labs and the role of knowledge in co-creation networks

Juan Pablo Centeno

PhD researcher at the KU Leuven Public Governance Institute (PGI)

Prof. dr. Trui Steen

Director and Full Professor of Public Governance and Coproduction of Public Services, KU Leuven Public Governance Institute (PGI)

Dr. Paula Rodriguez Müller

Scientific Policy Officer at the European Commission - Joint Research Centre

AbstractThis research project questions what are the conditions under which co-creation networks develop social innovations in the context of grand challenges, and how do these conditions influence the tensions and practices of knowledge circulation in the co-creation process? The focus is on configurations of structural and collaborative conditions defining how different sources of knowledge inform the co-creation of social innovations. Theoretically, it builds on co-creation literature, network and collaborative governance theory, and boundary work, to identify the governance attributes of successful co-creations. Empirically, multisector European Living Labs are analysed, as relevant instances of networked co-creation. A mixed methods approach is employed, combining Social Network Analysis (SNA), Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), and in-depth case studies. The project will deliver systematic empirical insights on how Living Labs facilitate the co-creation of social innovations in different sectors. It will also contribute to co-creation literature by conceptualising the role of knowledge in multistakeholder collaborations aimed at societal change and sustainability transitions.

Key words: Co-creation, Knowledge, Social innovation, Collaborative governance, Living labs, Network governance